Can We Reduce Spending While Still Helping Low-Income Families? | Hoover Fiscal Policy Initiative

Well-designed benefit reductions can encourage independence when reforms have the right incentives. The 1996 welfare reform that added time limits and work requirements to cash assistance programs initially faced criticism but ultimately improved outcomes for single-parent families. Effective anti-poverty programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit transfer income to low-income families while simultaneously encouraging work, providing both immediate relief and long-term mobility. Rather than merely lifting people above a poverty line by giving cash, the most successful fiscal approaches promote independence by carefully designing incentives that don’t discourage work.

Learn more at: https://www.hoover.org/research-teams/fiscal-policy-initiative?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=description&utm_campaign=fpi_description

Featuring:
– Scott Winship, American Enterprise Institute
– Bruce Meyer, University of Chicago
– Richard Burkhauser, Cornell University

_________
The opinions expressed on this channel are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Hoover Institution or Stanford University.

© 2025 by the Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University.

🔔 Subscribe for more discussions: @HooverInstitution
👍 Like and share this video!

🌐 Follow us on social media:
• Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/HooverInstStanford
• LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hoover-institution-at-stanford-university
• Instagram: https://instagram.com/hooverinstitution
• TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hooverinstitution
• X: https://www.twitter.com/HooverInst

Hoover Institution

The Hoover Institution, officially The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution, and Peace, is an American public policy think tank and research institution that promotes personal and economic liberty, free enterprise, and limited government.

Exit mobile version